Guest Posted September 3, 2020 Share Posted September 3, 2020 https://www.tmz.com/2020/09/03/daniel-prude-death-police-video-suffocation-hood-rochester-ny/ These guys chuckling about the guy as they suffocate him is just twisted stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaladinSolo Posted September 3, 2020 Share Posted September 3, 2020 No worries guys, they've had this video for almost 6 months, now was clearly when they were going to act anyways. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marioandsonic Posted September 3, 2020 Share Posted September 3, 2020 Don't worry, it will come out later that was in the same zip code as someone who smoked weed a few years ago, and therefore he deserved to die. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spork3245 Posted September 3, 2020 Share Posted September 3, 2020 1 minute ago, marioandsonic said: Don't worry, it will come out later that was in the same zip code as someone who smoked weed a few years ago, and therefore he deserved to die. Also, he had COVID. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 3, 2020 Share Posted September 3, 2020 29 minutes ago, Spork3245 said: Also, he had COVID. They will somehow argue that Covid was the cause of death in this case Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spork3245 Posted September 3, 2020 Share Posted September 3, 2020 1 minute ago, sblfilms said: They will somehow argue that Covid was the cause of death in this case 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marioandsonic Posted September 3, 2020 Share Posted September 3, 2020 3 minutes ago, sblfilms said: They will somehow argue that Covid was the cause of death in this case But Covid doesn't kill people. And police brutality doesn't exist. So... Is he actually still alive?! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 1 minute ago, Spork3245 said: What is the joke in how people will deny wrongdoing in the killing of this guy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 He wished himself dead to make our POLICE and PRESIDENT look bad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spork3245 Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 30 minutes ago, sblfilms said: What is the joke in how people will deny wrongdoing in the killing of this guy? He doesn’t have COVID. The joke was that they’ll claim he has COVID. You then stated the obvious in saying they’ll then blame COVID for his death... because that was literally the entire point of the sarcastic post about him having COVID. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaku3 Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 20 minutes ago, marioandsonic said: But Covid doesn't kill people. And police brutality doesn't exist. So... Is he actually still alive?! In Cuba with Tupac and Fidel. Possibly JFK. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cusideabelincoln Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 1 hour ago, marioandsonic said: But Covid doesn't kill people. And police brutality doesn't exist. So... Is he actually still alive?! No definitely not, some white dude shot him out self defense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skillzdadirecta Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 1 hour ago, Zaku3 said: In Cuba with Tupac and Fidel. Possibly JFK. Don't forget Bruce Lee, Elvis and Kurt Cobain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keyser_Soze Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 2 hours ago, sblfilms said: What is the joke in how people will deny wrongdoing in the killing of this guy? I don't know but I'm with you. Shame on people making light of an innocent African American dying. They should be lighting candles in their homes and saying prayers for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 2 hours ago, Spork3245 said: *sigh* The joke was that they’ll claim he has COVID. You then stated the obvious in saying they’ll then blame COVID for his death... because that was literally the entire point of the sarcastic post about him having COVID. I guess that is a joke. Humor is certainly subjective. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spork3245 Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 4 minutes ago, sblfilms said: I guess that is a joke. Humor is certainly subjective. Interesting that you don’t take offense to the sarcasm I quoted and was adding onto with “Also, COVID”. The “joke” wasn’t about his wrongful death, it is in regards to how cops/blue lives matter idiots will try to spin it as not being the fault of the cops. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 Just now, Spork3245 said: Interesting that you don’t take offense to the sarcasm I quoted and was adding onto with “Also, COVID”. I’d be more than happy to explain why in a PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spork3245 Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 1 minute ago, sblfilms said: I’d be more than happy to explain why in a PM K 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 3 minutes ago, Spork3245 said: K Sent Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CastlevaniaNut18 Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 Whyyyyyyy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricofoley Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CitizenVectron Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 8 hours ago, Ricofoley said: Jesus fucking Christ. They went to "surveil" him, and just started opening fire when he got into his vehicle and drove away from his home because they "believed he was armed." This was a 100% gangland revenge murder. Of the multiple officers and agencies present, what do you want to bet that none had dashcams or bodycams on? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CitizenVectron Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 US Marshals and at least three local agencies (including department of corrections?) were on the scene. Marshals report that the three local agencies opened fire first: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CitizenVectron Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 What could possibly have been an NYPD unmarked car drove through a crowd of protesters in Times Square last night. NYPD says it wasn't theirs, but it did have some equipment that they usually have (bullbar, headlamp): Some people were hit and injured, though none seriously, it seems. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CitizenVectron Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 Looks like they were pro-Trump counter-protesters who were escorted into the vehicle by police: The police literally shield them as they get into the car, and watch as the car races to the protest and then drives into it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 40 minutes ago, CitizenVectron said: What could possibly have been an NYPD unmarked car drove through a crowd of protesters in Times Square last night. NYPD says it wasn't theirs, but it did have some equipment that they usually have (bullbar, headlamp): Some people were hit and injured, though none seriously, it seems. They have to specify that it's not the NYPD since the NYPD was the first to start ramming protestors with their cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 The police report from the Jacob Blake shooting says that the woman who called 911 alleges that Blake sexually assaulted her by digital penetration prior to the arrival of the police. Once again, we can oppose racist policing without pretending this guy was a great person. Him being a good or bad guy is not relevant to whether police ought to be shooting people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chadatog Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 2 hours ago, sblfilms said: The police report from the Jacob Blake shooting says that the woman who called 911 alleges that Blake sexually assaulted her by digital penetration prior to the arrival of the police. Once again, we can oppose racist policing without pretending this guy was a great person. Him being a good or bad guy is not relevant to whether police ought to be shooting people. I don't know about this. A master debater once told me that if you think the person was not a good guy you are wising that he got shot, raped or something horrible and totes deserved it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spork3245 Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 Hot take: cops aren’t supposed to kill guilty people either Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 6 minutes ago, Chadatog said: I don't know about this. A master debater once told me that if you think the person was not a good guy you are wising that he got shot, raped or something horrible. That is not at all what I said or suggested. What I did argue is that we shouldn’t downplay bad things (like sexual harassment) on people just because we dislike them. That take is perfectly consistent with this one which is that Jacob Blake being a bad guy, including likely sexually assaulting a woman for at least the second time on record in the immediate moments prior to police arriving, has no bearing on whether him being shot by the police was OK. What we shouldn’t do in the Jacob Blake case, or SHS for that matter, is to paper over the character of the person because of their victim hood in a separate scenario. 1 minute ago, Spork3245 said: Hot take: cops aren’t supposed to kill guilty people either Exactly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost_MH Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 1 minute ago, sblfilms said: That is not at all what I said or suggested. What I did argue is that we shouldn’t downplay bad things (like sexual harassment) on people just because we dislike them. That take is perfectly consistent with this one which is that Jacob Blake being a bad guy, including likely sexually assaulting a woman for at least the second time on record, has no bearing on whether him being shot by the police was OK. What we shouldn’t do in the Jacob Blake case, or SHS for that matter, is to paper over the character of the person because of their victim hood in a separate scenario. Exactly. If Jacob Blake made a career of claiming there was no such thing as systemic racism and BLM is just a bunch of attention whores to an audience of a hundred million across the country... It's still a terrible thing, but how should we treat the people that voted for face eating leopards, got they're faces eaten, and swear they wouldn't change a thing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chadatog Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 15 minutes ago, sblfilms said: That is not at all what I said or suggested. What I did argue is that we shouldn’t downplay bad things (like sexual harassment) on people just because we dislike them. That take is perfectly consistent with this one which is that Jacob Blake being a bad guy, including likely sexually assaulting a woman for at least the second time on record in the immediate moments prior to police arriving, has no bearing on whether him being shot by the police was OK. What we shouldn’t do in the Jacob Blake case, or SHS for that matter, is to paper over the character of the person because of their victim hood in a separate scenario. allegedly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commissar SFLUFAN Posted September 5, 2020 Share Posted September 5, 2020 I just want to point out that I NEVER downplay the bad things that happen to people I don't like. On the contrary, I want those things to be intensified to apocalyptic levels! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 5, 2020 Share Posted September 5, 2020 51 minutes ago, Ghost_MH said: If Jacob Blake made a career of claiming there was no such thing as systemic racism and BLM is just a bunch of attention whores to an audience of a hundred million across the country... It's still a terrible thing, but how should we treat the people that voted for face eating leopards, got they're faces eaten, and swear they wouldn't change a thing? This isn’t the thread for that conversation, fyi. I only responded to the mischaracterization of what I said in regards to its relationship to this post. 41 minutes ago, Chadatog said: allegedly Even this notation doesn’t matter. The whole point is if Jacob Blake is a bad guy who sexually assaults women his treatment by police is not altered for the good or bad because of it. They are separate issues. It’s not bad for police to use excessive force or behave in a racist way because the victim is a good person, it’s bad without regard for the quality of person they victimize. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.