Jump to content

Horizon: An American Saga trailer -- Kevin Costner's new western


Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Commissar SFLUFAN said:

So this is why he burned his "Yellowstone" bridges, eh?

 

This genuinely does look really quite good!

That’s how I understand it. This is his passion project, and as soon as he had the juice to get it off the ground, he noped out of Yellowstone as fast as possible. 

  • Halal 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This looks like he was jealous that he couldn't star in 1883, so he made his own.

 

It could well just be YouTube compression, but even at 4K something about this trailer doesn't look quite right. I feel like it's not very consistent in it's color or noise or sharpness or something. Hard to put my finger on it.

 

Trailer didn't really sell me, but I'm always down for a solid western and it sure seems like Costner cares a whole lot about this, so hopefully it pays off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I imagine how much you'll enjoy this will depend on how much you enjoyed Costner's three previous directorial efforts Dances with Wolves, The Postman and Open Range (all three of which he also starred in, as is the case here). Or how much you enjoyed projects he starred in that he was also heavily involved in shepherding like Wyatt Earp, Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves, Waterworld or Thirteen Days despite not writing or directing them.

 

I don't watch Yellowstone but I do think it's a super dick move of him to leave the show midway through season 5 when the show was always planned to just be 6 seasons. He could have easily finished the show and then made this but instead chose to screw over the cast, crew and fans of Yellowstone instead. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cannot tell what the story of this movie is. Also the score is horrifically generic. Like absolutely disgusting and offensively so. The cast looks great, though.

 

21 minutes ago, Greatoneshere said:

I don't watch Yellowstone but I do think it's a super dick move of him to leave the show midway through season 5 when the show was always planned to just be 6 seasons. He could have easily finished the show and then made this but instead chose to screw over the cast, crew and fans of Yellowstone instead. 

 

I'm saying this just based on clips I've seen and the general vibe I get of the fanbase, but nothing of value was lost. :p But I do sympathize with the cast and crew.

 

22 minutes ago, Greatoneshere said:

I imagine how much you'll enjoy this will depend on how much you enjoyed Costner's three previous directorial efforts Dances with Wolves, The Postman and Open Range (all three of which he also starred in, as is the case here). Or how much you enjoyed projects he starred in that he was also heavily involved in shepherding like Wyatt Earp, Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves, Waterworld or Thirteen Days despite not writing or directing them.

 

Well, his directorial track record appears pretty good so that's a plus. I remember really liking Open Range but I haven't seen it since I worked at the video store as a teenager around its release date.

  • Halal 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, GeneticBlueprint said:

Well, his directorial track record appears pretty good so that's a plus. I remember really liking Open Range but I haven't seen it since I worked at the video store as a teenager around its release date.

 

Yeah, I agree, his track record overall is pretty good - the only question will be if he's still got it since it's been 20 years since he directed Open Range in 2003. Here's to hoping this is good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Got a chance to see part 1 last week and given how Yellowstone has gone off the rails, I’m very glad he ditched it in favor of this. If you enjoy the genre, you will probably like this entry. Not his best directorial effort, but solid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Truthfully, between 'Dances with Wolves' & 'Wyatt Earp', I am SO down for another grand western adventure w/ Costner in the lead (also THAT FREAKING CAST!!) so yeah, definitely will be tuning in!

  • Hugs 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

It got kind of a mixed reception at Cannes, but here's a pretty positive review from a writer I like:

WWW.BFI.ORG.UK

Almost every genre cliché is lovingly excavated for the first chapter in Kevin Costner’s epic four-part western, but its traditional approach is part of its charm.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I was not a fan at all. Way too long, the villians are way over written, everyone else is probably underwritten. There's no visual charm to speak of, too often rendering incredible landscapes a backlot feeling. It's a western going through the motions without a sense of purpose. I was quite dissapointed.

  • Shocked 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TwinIon said:

I was not a fan at all. Way too long, the villians are way over written, everyone else is probably underwritten. There's no visual charm to speak of, too often rendering incredible landscapes a backlot feeling. It's a western going through the motions without a sense of purpose. I was quite dissapointed.

 

How does it fair to Costner's three previous directorial efforts (Dances with Wolves, The Postman and Open Range), if you've seen those? Just seeing where you stand overall with his skills as a director what would you rate/rank them vs. this? Also would it be better if you had all four parts to watch it all at once or unsalvageable do you think? I'm not very invested in this project either way but I am curious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Greatoneshere said:

How does it fair to Costner's three previous directorial efforts (Dances with Wolves, The Postman and Open Range), if you've seen those? Just seeing where you stand overall with his skills as a director what would you rate/rank them vs. this? Also would it be better if you had all four parts to watch it once or unsalvageable do you think? I'm not very invested in this project either way but I am curious.

It's been a long time since I've seen his other efforts, and I don't think I've ever seen Open Range, but I remember Dances with Wolves fondly.

 

I think this one just fails with pacing. It's spending a ton of time showing you the same thing over and over again. Characters are all paper thin, and you know them basically right away, which is probably fine for a western so intent on cliches. It just can't justify how long they spend on any individual scene or sequence. Pretty much every single one could be cut in half without losing anything. There's probably a decent movie in this one if you edit it way down.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...