TwinIon Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 Since the Electoral College is scheduled to vote on Monday, hopefully that means we'll see SCOTUS kill off this nonsense by then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaladinSolo Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 Just now, TwinIon said: Since the Electoral College is scheduled to vote on Monday, hopefully that means we'll see SCOTUS kill off this nonsense by then. More likely is SCOTUS going "Well the EC already voted, sorry can't help you." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commissar SFLUFAN Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 The most scathing judicial vitriol that has been levelled against these ludicrous claims has come from conservative judges. I guess this is one instance where the conservative predilection for "law and order" came in useful! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 Just now, Commissar SFLUFAN said: The most scathing judicial vitriol that has been levelled against these ludicrous claims has come from conservative judges. I guess this is one instance where the conservative predilection for "law and order" came in useful! Or they just don't want to blow their wad on blowing up their legitimacy for anything other than making us a theocracy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 seditious abuse of the judicial process whew Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5timechamp Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 Well we are truly screwed.. the mounds of evidence of fraud are no more... apparently the fraud committed was undetectable says Agent Orange Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 37 minutes ago, 5timechamp said: Well we are truly screwed.. the mounds of evidence of fraud are no more... apparently the fraud committed was undetectable says Agent Orange I wish the Dems were so good as to do fraud at this level. Then we'd certainly have won the Senate and not have to hope the GA runoffs go the right way Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 3 minutes ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said: I wish the Dems were so good as to do fraud at this level. Then we'd certainly have won the Senate and not have to hope the GA runoffs go the right way But why grift $12 million when you can instead just inexplicably not spend it on your campaign? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 1 hour ago, Jason said: pelosi should refuse to seat any of these 106 congressmen until their claim that they were fraudulently elected is resolved Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 3 minutes ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said: pelosi should refuse to seat any of these 106 congressmen until their claim that they were fraudulently elected is resolved that doesn't sound very civil doe 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5timechamp Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 6 minutes ago, Jason said: that doesn't sound very civil doe Its the old Social Network logic: “Its unbecoming for gentlemen of harvard” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
69los Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 47 minutes ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said: pelosi should refuse to seat any of these 106 congressmen until their claim that they were fraudulently elected is resolved The curious case of the mysteriously missing quiver. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Littleronin Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 I wouldn't seat them just based on the fact that they are unwilling to uphold their oath of office. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricofoley Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 Quote Amendment XIV Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the executive and judicial officers of a state, or the members of the legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such state, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such state. Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. seems pretty clear cut to me idk 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mclumber1 Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 2 minutes ago, Ricofoley said: seems pretty clear cut to me idk Those people would have to be convicted for insurrection or sedition first before section 3 would be applicable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 I was thinking more along the lines of article 1 section 5 Quote Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaladinSolo Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazyPiranha Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 8 minutes ago, PaladinSolo said: "The same professionalism and energy you have brought to all your work in the past"? So what, they're going to halfheartedly shit in all the houseplants while carving "MAGA" into their desks with their keys? 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 55 minutes ago, LazyPiranha said: "The same professionalism and energy you have brought to all your work in the past"? So what, they're going to halfheartedly shit in all the houseplants while carving "MAGA" into their desks with their keys? 15 flusher upper deckers in every toilet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewhyteboar Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 56 minutes ago, LazyPiranha said: "The same professionalism and energy you have brought to all your work in the past"? So what, they're going to halfheartedly shit in all the houseplants while carving "MAGA" into their desks with their keys? This administration has only shown professionalism and energy for crimes and white supremacy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spork3245 Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 10 hours ago, 69los said: The curious case of the mysteriously missing quiver. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marioandsonic Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 When should we expect to hear from the SCOTUS about this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Littleronin Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 3 minutes ago, Jason said: I had to giggle when I seen that it was filed from Pahrump. Good bunch of proper crazies there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stepee Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 What’s the reasoning supposed to be with filing under New California and New Nevada? I’m confused like exactly they are even trying to say with that. Is New California anywhere with poc and regular California is the rural areas that voted fine or what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarSolo Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Air_Delivery Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 U.S. Supreme Court rejects Texas Attorney General's presidential election lawsuit - KVIA KVIA.COM WASHINGTON, DC -- In an unsigned order Friday afternoon, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton seeking to overturn presidential election results in four swing states. The high court said the state of Texas lacked standing to file the suit which sought to intervene in the handling of GG REKT 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marioandsonic Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firewithin Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Air_Delivery Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 I'm just waiting for the twitter meltdown as Trump realizes its over. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwinIon Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 So are there any more cases that Trump has pending? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.