Spork3245

@Kal-El814 - what do you think?

#ConvicttheSwamp

What's your current CPU? Also, where are you seeing that it bottlenecks your system?

I think you both mean "Pardon"?

Only if the scarecrow is there too

This is how it should have ended: But with Mark Ruffalo and Robert Downy Jr.

I’m by no means arguing in favor of GSync.

Gsync is technically superior to Freesync (no clue about 2.1’s VRR, but it’s likely the same case) as it’s a hardware solution vs a software solution, but it’s by an indecipherable amount that requires a 600fps camera to capture the difference - though that fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a millisecond will certainly be nVidia’s reasoning for keeping it around, at least on monitors. The issue is also that we don’t know if monitors will adopt 2.1 VRR as they are primarily display port and I’m unaware of any VRR standards upcoming to DP. To your other point, I would highly doubt that nVidia has included a 2.0b-2.1 hybrid HDMI out on the 20xx series like MS did on the XboneX and Samsung did on the Q9 without making a huge deal about it (both MS and Samsung made a bunch of noise about their inclusion... and this is nVidia we’re talking about! )

It’d be totally fine if they stuck with GSync for monitors and display port, especially since HDMI VRR =/= Freesync. I am highly concerned about HDMI 2.1 compliance on future cards, however, especially since these cards really should have been 2.1 compliant given that nVidia was the first to adopt 2.0b compliancy to give 4k 60hz HDR to PC.

I’m actually a bit worried that nVidia will skip full HDMI 2.1 support, mostly VRR, in some BS attempt to push their upcoming TVs/Large-Scale Monitors.

I suspect @Mr.Vic20‘s upcoming RTitanX will cost approximately the same as Betsy Devos’ lost yacht and be able to run the Ray-Tracing effects in full fidelity at 4k in a smooth framerate* *Smooth framerate requires one of nVidia’s upcoming GSYNC TVs

Did they reunite as heels? Hmmmmmm Also, mystery solved on why Balor was suddenly booked strong again - so he could lose to Roman.

Oh, fuck off.

Clicking links is for nerds.

It’s what they use in movies, even in OG Toy Story, so... yea, it’s “been around for awhile”. It’s generally very taxing for real-time rendering, that’s what’s exciting about the “RTX” tech, with it being more feasible on a greater scale than past implementations (some older games had single objects, like clouds, being ray-traced as a gimmick to say “hey, look!”). Anyway, yea, the prices on the new cards are insane and removed all excitement for me.

Liar. You shop on Amazon.

I didn't say pizza.

Is it proper to tip prostitutes?

Filled with Zunes!

You need to up your prices.

"shit come out my hole too, also husband mouth"

They used Brock a lot more frequently prior to the "he's never here" storyline. His feud with Samoa Joe was absolutely epic, and also the feud with Braun/Kane when Braun dropped the Titantron on him - don't fall for the nonsense (for most of 2017 Lesnar had an average of 1 match per month with showing up on Raw every 3 weeks on average). With Roman, remember his past two title reigns? HHH feud and Sheamus feud? The entire story and any feud they put him in was "we gotta make him look strong, so the only way Reigns loses is through underhanded/chicken-shit means!". Welcome to round #3. The Lesnar crap was smoke and mirrors - don't fall for it. Very few had any problems with his "infrequency" prior to WWE using storylines to make a big deal about it and actually cutting his appearances back in an attempt to get Reign's cheered. In fact, on the old board, we all celebrated it as a way to make the belt feel "more special" and "enhance" the IC title.

I thought you were poor due to the tariffs affecting your margins from prostitution?

PASS