CitizenVectron

Have a good time with that if gas goes up again.

Awww! He loves candy, and being responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocents.

But why!?

Yeah I think that the leader should be able to choose the person, but should have a short list chosen for them.

To me the issue isn't how extreme he is (though of course that is troubling), it's that a president mired in a scandal about the legitimacy of his election is about to appoint someone for life to SCOTUS, someone who will likely oversee cases about that scandal. That is why he should not be appointed.

He is handing Trudeau the next Canadian election. What a moron.

Yeah Schumer is a disgrace, and McConnell is a master.

53 minutes ago, Greatoneshere said:

 

HOLY SHIT.

 

This is, indeed, a potentially very big deal.

No it's not. Nothing will be done.

Also most provincial governments already cover prescriptions if they are expensive and you make under a certain amount. My gf is on a $75,000/yr MS treatment and the government pays for it all.

On 8/23/2018 at 12:29 AM, Jason said:

https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/22/politics/starr-grand-jury-leak-report-kavanaugh/index.html

The GOP still won't care. Their goal, above all else (including following any and all laws) is to win. Their supporters know this and agree with it. The law doesn't matter to the GOP, and it's probably only a matter of time until they outright ignore an actual election result.

Haha yeah sure. "Sorry police, I can't hand over evidence because it was stolen!"

Isn't this a bit risky considering that Google is suing Uber for stealing its self-driving tech? (well, suing Uber for using stolen tech brought over by an ex-Google employee)

I hope they dip into Lovecraftian lore again.

4 hours ago, SFLUFAN said:

I just want to point out that this joke is funnier than anything John Oliver, Samantha Bee, or Trevor Noah has ever done.

And the Canada-US Trade Agreement's supporters will be CUSTArds.

Let's just hope that Canada never makes an agreement with the UN...

17 minutes ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said:

I don't give a shit about the continued digs at Bernie, but this is interesting perspective

If you're going to let the nominee be chosen by party members, then a straight-up popular vote is the way to go. Just do it all at once nation-wide following an inner-party campaign. I think that that is a mistake (allowing people to choose their leader willy-nilly), but if you're going to allow it then that is what should be done, not this nonsense of stretching it out over months and giving more weight to small states.

14 minutes ago, SaysWho? said:

 

 

He's polite and dignified while voting for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people. That's the American ideal.

Shut it down, jail anyone who knew.

Australians do tend to have shitty Prime Ministers.

28 minutes ago, Boyle5150 said:

60% of qualified voters voted.  Then on top of that, you have Hillary winning the popular vote, and on top of that Trump ran against HC.  What I mean by "represents" is that Trumps views do not represent "white people".  

What was his winning % of white suburban voters, though? If you take away white people in the major urban centres on the coasts, he probably had quite the margin on white suburban voters.

Nah, probably around 8-10.